Method 03 · Observe
S-Curve Analysis
A technology's performance does not grow linearly with the effort invested but in an S-shape: a sluggish start, a steep middle, a flattening out at a physical or economic limit. Whoever knows where on the curve a technology stands knows whether further investment still buys progress — or whether the leaps have long been happening on a new, lower curve. The transition between two curves is the most dangerous moment: the old technology is still better, the new one already faster.
Procedure
- Choose a performance measure. Which figure describes the technology — energy density, cost per unit, efficiency, error rate? No measure, no curve.
- Assemble the time series. Historical values over years; often laborious, usually worth it.
- Estimate the limit. Where does the physical or economic ceiling lie? That is the upper bound of the curve.
- Locate the position. Is the current state in the steep part or near the limit? The distance to the limit is the remaining potential.
- Look for the successor. Which technology starts a new curve — still worse, but with a higher limit?
Strengths
- Forces quantification where opinion otherwise reigns.
- Makes remaining potential and substitution risk visible.
- Proven across many technology generations.
Limits
- The limit is an assumption — historically it was often set too low.
- Not every technology has an unambiguous performance measure.
- Says nothing about market acceptance, only about technical possibility.
How we use it in our roadmaps
In the roadmaps the S-curve sits inside the block Maturity and uncertainty and in the timeline itself: where a sub-technology is in the steep part, we place milestones densely; where it approaches its limit, we shift the view to the successor technology. In batteries, for instance, the lithium-ion curve is flattening out while sodium-ion and solid-state begin curves of their own — that is the core of the roadmap "Energy Storage".
Where we have a performance measure and a time series, we show the curve in the roadmap; where we do not, we say so and lower the confidence.
References
- Foster, R. N. (1986): Innovation: The Attacker's Advantage. Summit Books, New York.
- Christensen, C. M. (1992): Exploring the Limits of the Technology S-Curve. Part I & II. Production and Operations Management, 1(4), 334–366.
- Sood, A. & Tellis, G. J. (2005): Technological Evolution and Radical Innovation. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 152–168.